Event 1 The Gene Didn't Get the Memo

For my first event of DESMA9 class, I attended Dr. Daniel Navon's "The Gene Didn't Get the Memo" presentation. Dr. Navon expands his research about the social studies of science and medicine, relating them to comparative-historical sociology and social theory. He wrote a book that will be published next year called "Mobalizing Mutations", which are the new kinds of people in genetics and patient advocacy, said the introduction for his presentation.

Dr. Daniel Navon preparing for his presentation

Dr. Navon first introduced his concepts using back-up statements and his beliefs through powerpoint slides. He mainly talked about mutations as the main topic, and extend his research into claiming that genetic mutations are difficult to interpret, and what's the solution for this unclearness as our generation is moving forward into an era of genomic, as known as precision medicine.

Dr. Daniel Navon explaining through his PPT slides

The unique part for attending this event is that I get to acknowledge the relationship for both social and science, as seen as a one of the major on campus, Society and Genetics. For the whole hour of presentation, I realized the complexity in the subject of science, by countless experiments and researches, to make sure they get the answer they want. However, coming up with the newer idea especially applied medical treatment, controversies are there within the comments of old-fashioned educated people. For example, Dr. Navon opens up to the audiences for their curiosity in the topics bu letting them ask questions, there are a couple of loop hole questions that the audience ask to proof him wrong, or basically disagreeing with him.

My experience towards this event resulted positively. I learned more about the relation of social and science put together. It is clear that they can compliment each others in a lot of ways, but to perfect the idea, one must truly believe in it and try to lessen the vagueness in topic as much as possible. This presentation definitely provide clarity on how science can emerge with the social development.

Location area

Location: South Campus, La Kretz Garden Pavilion

Comments

Week7 Neurosci + Art

For this week's topic, Neuroscience and art are depending on each other. Without the mind, imagination or brain, we are not able to create and classify the subject of art. As bizarre as it sounds, the brain is what construct art in our mind, while art fascinated the brain. In the field of neuroscience, the brain is being separated into parts and we can see that it allow humans to do incredible things that we are meant to. Brain in sections Carl Jung is a terrific example for investigating the brain. Religion is important because it produces a place of safety for a person to process their characteristics. I agree with Jung for the most part, but somehow it seems like an important point. As he unhurriedly processes from religion, he seemed off to another materials. Moreover, Jung examines psychology of "modern man" vs. "medieval man". Meanwhile, he degrades the actions of the modern man although he feels guilty of being one. It is unusual to explain this sor

Week6 BioTech+Art

I would say that this week's topic is a very thought provoking concept among any other that we have covered so far. It is somehow controversial with the impression that biology and art emerge with each other to create an ethical beliefs disturbance, as well as advancing itself in both fields With the fusion of art and biology, animals are going through their gene altercations. A very surprising fact, I did not come to a realization of how and when does rats became a testing subject for human in the medical studies. It is what we called Transgenic rats or "Test" rats (the rats that are being inserted with foreign DNA into their genome). The altercation of natural species brings up the serious ethical question, and the sophistication generates the controversy in today's society. Also, it does not allow for natural selection because artists and scientists urge to be knowledgable about this subject that potentially lead to a world dilemma. Furthermore, Professor Ve

Week8 NanoTech+Art

After watching lectures and reading the materials this week, I came to a realization that Nanotechnology is very complex and is important to our world. With its contribution to the field of technology and science, it has been a huge impact to that extent. It all began with Richard Feynman, he quoted “The principles of physics as far as I can see, do not speak against the possibility of maneuvering things atom by atom”(Feynman). He also claimed that how could one possibly move an atom, or let alone even touch one, in Dr. Gimzewski’s lecture. (Gimzewski) Richard Feynman As crucial as nanotechnology impacts science technology, it is an uprising in nano-robotics. Introducing the nanobots, or a reduced size robot. This became a massive advancement in both science and medicine technology. NOVA lecture explained that a tiny device like micro-robots, are capable for saving lives in the future.(NOVA) Technology will mainly depend on tiny gadgets that will possibly probe human body’s

DESMA9 PATTY T.

Search This Blog